Comments

greedy_new

Gevlon Globin is famous in the Word of Warcraft circle for having mastered the “gold cap”. His EVE journey show a very interesting “outside the box” approach to the game, PVE and the trade hubs, reason for which we invite you to pay a visit to his blog.

No, it’s not another business report, my income is 1.2B/day (8B/week) and no one cares about that. It’s a report on solo ganking. On Jan 27, 4 weeks ago I started solo ganking Code-violating, AFK-ing, untanked mining barges. I’ve been busy since then, and in the last 4 weeks I did not fleet up with anyone, so all my kills are solo. Look at the butchers bill:

  • Jan 27: 20 kills, 4890M
  • Jan 28: 11 kills, 1137M
  • Jan 29: 22 kills, 1457M
  • Feb 1: 9 kills, 352M
  • Feb 2: 19 kills, 738M
  • Feb 3: 24 kills, 2268M
  • Feb 5: 14 kills, 2907M
  • Feb 6: 16 kills, 1706M
  • Feb 7: 26 kills, 1692M
  • Feb 8: 7 kills, 477M
  • Feb 9: 42 kills, 2770M
  • Feb 10: 27 kills, 1415M
  • Feb 11: 15 kills, 1288M
  • Feb 12: 18 kills, 960M
  • Feb 13: 36 kills, 3960M
  • Feb 14: 26 kills, 1538M
  • Feb 15: 19 kills, 1720M
  • Feb 16: 29 kills, 1926M
  • Feb 17: 54 kills, 3755M
  • Feb 18: 23 kills, 2254M
  • Feb 19: 34 kills, 1944M
  • Feb 20: 25 kills, 1803M
  • Feb 21: 15 kills, 759M
  • Feb 22: 37 kills, 2706M
  • Feb 23: 39 kills, 1663M

Since weekends provide more kills, it’s best to evaluate the results on a weekly basis:

  1. 81 kills, 8.57B
  2. 129 kills, 11.82B
  3. 170 kills, 12.81B
  4. 227 kills, 14.88B

As you can see it’s increasing week by week as I’m improving. Calculating from the first four weeks, my weekly average is 152 solo kills and 12B ISK damage. (659 and 52.2B/month)

It’s not easy to put this number into context because everyone and his mother has 1000+/month kills, 50B+ ISK damage done and 99.99% efficiency due to the way the killboard calculates these: you get full value for every kill you took part in. If you were in a noobship in Asakai you could easily get 700B kills. However this error is smaller for corporations and even smaller (though non-zero) for alliances. If 10 corpies kill a ship, each of them get the full value, but the corp gets only one value, not 10x. Of course if members of two corps kill something, both corps get the kill, so even corp kills are overestimated. However as we move to larger and larger entities, the error decreases. So let’s compare this 12B/week solo kills to the largest sov-holder alliance: TEST. Their killboard has weekly results:

  • Week 7: 3334 Ships killed (242.18B ISK)
  • Week 6: 3543 Ships killed (229.4B ISK)
  • Week 5: 3628 Ships killed (283.49B ISK)
  • Week 4: 3968 Ships killed (647.6B ISK) Asakai week
  • Week 3: 3360 Ships killed (316.44B ISK)
  • Week 2: 3780 Ships killed (220.96B ISK)
  • Week 1: 3434 Ships killed (278.94B ISK)
  • Week 52: 3157 Ships killed (176.82B ISK) 2012 week 52 of course
  • Week 51: 2604 Ships killed (180.56B ISK)
  • Week 50: 3041 Ships killed (233.7B ISK)
  • Week 49: 2274 Ships killed (240.64B ISK)
  • Week 48: 1468 Ships killed (101.94B ISK)
  • Week 47: 1673 Ships killed (123.79B ISK)
  • Week 46: 2558 Ships killed (137.34B ISK)
  • Week 45: 2751 Ships killed (187.82B ISK)

The last 15 weeks of TEST had lulls and deployments, Christmas and Asakai. The average is: 2972 kills and 240B ISK damage done. I’d remind you that this data is still not perfect as many of these kills had participating people from out of TEST (like every living body on those Asakai titans) but let’s be generous and accept all of these as TEST kills and with that we get the result: I killed 1/20 as many ships and 1/20 as much ISK as the 13000 member TEST alliance. Does this “1/20 of TEST” gives anyone deja vu? If you care to divide 13000 by 20, you get that I destroyed 650x more ISK than an average TEST member. Ouch!

OK, TEST is known to be bad at EVE, let’s look at the oh-so-elite NCdot:

  • Feb (on 20th): 3928 Ships killed (535.02B ISK)
  • Jan: 9004 Ships killed (1444.49B ISK)
  • Dec: 6326 Ships killed (544.55B ISK)
  • Nov: 5059 Ships killed (676.51B ISK)

This covers 111 days, so on an average week they kill 1533 ships and 202B ISK, 10x more ships and 17x more ISK than me. Considering they have 1650 members, I outperformed the average NC. pilot 163x in kills and 98x in value. Oh, so elite, I wish I could be there.

The Pandemic Legion killboard is weird enough to stop me from getting ISK destroyed data, but their stats show about 1.5x more kills for the various corps than EVE-Kill.net (some kills are not uploaded to the public board). So I went to EVE-Kill and found:

  • Feb (on 20th): 4310 Ships killed (476.13B ISK)
  • Jan: 8446 Ships killed (1697.61B ISK)
  • Dec: 5186 Ships killed (800.19B ISK)
  • Nov: 2891 Ships killed (454.22B ISK)

Multiplying by 1.5 we get 1971 kills and 324B ISK for a week. With 1736 members, it’s 134x more kills and 64x more ISK destroyed for me than the average PL member. I tried to write something witty here, but failed.

Let’s look at small-gang elite alliances, like Rote Kapelle (where Jester plays):

  • Week 7: 227 Ships killed (12.44B ISK)
  • Week 6: 275 Ships killed (18.83B ISK)
  • Week 5: 180 Ships killed (19.27B ISK)
  • Week 4: 318 Ships killed (22.41B ISK)
  • Week 3: 222 Ships killed (33.34B ISK)
  • Week 2: 208 Ships killed (9.23B ISK)
  • Week 1: 452 Ships killed (22.06B ISK)
  • Week 52: 196 Ships killed (14.96B ISK)
  • Week 51: 320 Ships killed (35.8B ISK)
  • Week 50: 309 Ships killed (37.08B ISK)
  • Week 49: 405 Ships killed (50.48B ISK)
  • Week 48: 243 Ships killed (20.5B ISK)
  • Week 47: 188 Ships killed (22.47B ISK)
  • Week 46: 198 Ships killed (16.43B ISK)
  • Week 45: 189 Ships killed (21.5B ISK)

The average is 262 kills, 23.8B ISK, so I alone did half as much ISK damage as the whole Rote Kapelle, 122x more than an average member. I earned money with ganking, more than my catalysts cost. An average ret gank provides 5-6M net income, despite I didn’t pick them after fitting, but rather pilot age.

No, the purpose of these hilarious numbers are not to make these alliances look like clowns. I made it to expose the huge inbalance between highsec and nullsec. A small corp of me and 19 of my clones could outperform the largest sov-holder alliance both in ISK generation and kills. How? Because I’m in highsec, where the money is. Money means “farms and fields”: the “peasants” who generate the income to nullsec are not in nullsec but in highsec. Nullsec alliance members can’t compete with me because the farmers of their enemies are not in nullsec. A TEST roam can’t kill FA miners, highsec gankers can. Since the miners, ratters and missioners are barely present in nullsec, null is nearly empty, PvP-ers find no one one to kill.

On the top of the huge income potential, highsec also provides anonymity. Some people might be tempted to say “the members of these alliances with joke stats could defeat me 1v1 and could end my highsec massacre with a few seboed Tornados”, but they are wrong. They could only camp Botslayer Goblin, my 2 months old pilot into a station while I can easily continue somewhere else on an unnamed alt. You can’t do the same in nullsec because your friends would shoot your unnamed alt, not knowing it’s you. Losing ships to friends is bad enough, but imagine the consequences if you shoot a wrong neutral Falcon!

Without huge nerfs to highsec income to force at least the nullsec people to live in nullsec instead of farming in AFK Retrievers on the other screen, nullsec remains the wasteland it is today, lacking both decent income and targets to kill. If you want something bigger in nullsec than idiotic frig/T1 cruiser roams, vote for highsec nerfing candidates for the next CSM. Until CCP fixes this, leave that empty wasteland and come where the money and the targets are: highsec. There are enough untanked barges and 10+B, zero buffer missioning battleships for everyone!

Beside voting, the nulseccers could do more: hold a “strike” when they refuse to kill each other in nullsec, instead they come and gank in highsec. Not in the wasteful “Burn Jita” style, but smartly, with solo-duo catalysts farming miners in 0.5-0.7 and dropping Taloses on scanned down missioners. This can be done profitably and can be upheld eternally, until CCP finally fixes the nullsec economy and makes it profitable to live there. Alternatively they could hold a capital mining op where the capitals and supers of various alliances are peacefully mining as a protest against the messed up EVE economy. The end goal is to have significantly higher ISK/hour in nullsec, therefore creating targets there. As long as a highsec ganker has higher ISK destroyed than an average Pandemic Legion member, the high-null balancing is not acceptable.

– Gevlon Goblin

154 Comments

  1. Who knows

    There is so much stuff here that just screams "I have no idea what I am talking about but I think I do so listen to my words." First you say that you are earning more money and doing more damage than the average member? well that is making several assumptions, first you seem to be discounting alts both outside and inside corps, non -combat alts in a corp will drag down the average, an average you do not seem to be applying to yourself.

    second this line "A small corp of me and 19 of my clones," do you mean you are using 20 characters total for this? I assume so because I can't parse this any other way than and have it make sense/ be relevant. if so you are imposing a average on other corps with numbers of characters rather than on the number of players, so apply the same restrictions to your self your average is a mere twentieth of your numbers. also people with out of corp alts, why are they not counted since you count yours? I get that you do not have data for this it would be very difficult to do so, but that is an extreme problem you are making a analysis based on numbers that you clearly don't have and are tying to patch it up to make it look like a solid argument.

    Next you claim there is almost no ratting, mission running and mining in null? well I imagine there would be little missioning in sov-null since you know there would be a distinct lack of agents, a few exceptions aside. mining there clearly is a presence as despite the fact that null has such a smaller population than high the ores from null are pretty much around the same price a the high-sec ores per/m3 so clearly if the prices are down that low there is a massive supply which wouldn't be possible with out miner, as for ratting source please.

    fourth "Without huge nerfs to highsec income to force at least the nullsec people to live in nullsec instead of farming in AFK Retrievers on the other screen, nullsec remains the wasteland it is today." I'm really not sure where to begin here. why would nerfing high send null players back to null? and more importantly what about the high-sec players? Are you genuinely suggesting that you should screw over the majority on the player base simply to fit your idea of what null should be?

    Your conclusion doesn't even make sense, you are arguing that the lack of people in null is a problem so you want null players to go and start ganking hi-sec players and stop living in null. a complete one-eighty of your argument. I am calling ulterior motive on this. when you came up with your one empire idea you wanted the whole of null under one banner which would then "do our sacred duty: go to high, find the morons and slackers and gank them all!" this seems like exactly the same thing only with trying to trick people into doing your goals.

    February 25, 2013 at 8:37 pm Reply
  2. PL grunt

    Confirming killing people in highsec who don't want to PVP is elite PVP.

    Two fleets going head to head and having fun doing it is why we play eve, not 'the economy'.

    The idea that eve is fair/ should be fair or balanced is a fairy tale. Nullsec is far safer then high sec for the reasons you show above High sec is quite unsafe. Nullsec is very safe if you know what you are doing.

    The whole thing is skewed. More importantly sov grinding is still the worst game experience on earth and hence you get 0.0 stagnation (unless you pay for PL to do it for you)!

    February 25, 2013 at 8:48 pm Reply
  3. burnjita

    he wants to say nerf highsec… we should know allready that those people who cry such things like "nerf highsec", "remove local", "put lvl 4 Missions into lowsec" are completly retarded and dont know what they are talking.

    February 25, 2013 at 8:59 pm Reply
    1. retardedmonkeyfuck

      Yeah, Goblin gets the retarded-monkey-fuck award this week for so many reasons in that artical/shit stained bog roll. Pvp? Really? What a retarded monkey fuck.

      February 25, 2013 at 9:17 pm Reply
  4. 0.0 foeva

    Ew high sec!. Can't even jump clone to empire because it gives me cancer and/or aids.

    February 25, 2013 at 9:21 pm Reply
  5. Captain

    [youtube sO8tlP3_uac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO8tlP3_uac youtube]

    Had to be done.

    February 25, 2013 at 11:11 pm Reply
  6. Markethopper

    "This just in, I trained Catalyst skills so I can suicide gank miners in High-Sec and I am better than all of you."

    This is a news outlet, I fail to see the news. But while we are on this topic mainly about you and your delusions of grandeur, let's look at those kills shall we?

    A hard-fought battle against a defenseless retriever (quite possibly a fresh eve player scared to enter into the unknowns of low and nullsec) and the ever present Concord timer for your actions against them. You speak out as though this dull monotonous cycle of high sec mining for what little it yields in isk is wrong when they are afk or even semi-afk. I believe the New Order that you so adamantly hold to was put in place to punish macro-bot miner groups in highsec, and thus give them a "code" to deal with to promote actually being at the screen while breaking a rock (very exciting by the way).

    However, all that I see you uphold personally is taking any possible miner (be they afk or not) and laughing at their non-existant or poorly fitted mining ship (which begs even more to look at their age in eve and how much they really know of the game).

    There were buffs given by CCP to stop this rediculous destruction of miners in highsec, and the creation of lowsec was to promote more players moving down into nullsec as they are afraid to begin a life in constant combat. All you are doing, effectively, is killing off the new players in a very controversial exploitation of what highsec is supposed to be.

    tl:dr CCP doesn't want people like you playing their game. They prefer people who combat together in null and learn the basics in high.

    February 25, 2013 at 11:20 pm Reply
  7. Weaksauce

    Weakest article on EN24 for a long time, low moment.

    First up this is boasting wrapped up to try and look like something else. You can see from all the other comments Eve player base is far to switched on not to notice that.

    As to proving any points, well shock horror all the easy targets are sitting in Hi-Sec. Everyone knew that already….

    All involved lost a lot of credibility in posting this garbage.

    February 25, 2013 at 11:50 pm Reply
  8. sigh

    How can he even think to compare his kill ratio to that of nullsec? He's farming defenseless players who just want to relax. He can warp to almost any system and find some helpless miner to pop. Nullsec are warfare they don't hunt defenseless players, they hunt for fleet fights and groups share in on the kills. They really only hunt miners when bored or needing to sabotage an enemy system. The only thing Goblins posts prove is that he's a coward. He preys on the defenseless, hides behind the securities of high sec and brags about his plethora of alts he can jump around to if anyone actually tries to pick a fight with him.
    In fact his Corp "Code" or order or whatever its called, proudly pronounces that declaring war on them is a waste of isk as they'll just hide with their neutral alts

    February 26, 2013 at 12:05 am Reply
  9. Wake up riv

    Okay thats it. If there will be one more article of this dickhead on this site it will be the last time i came here. I don´t care if Riv is short on writers or articles or just jerks of to all the rage this guy causes.

    Retards like him should not be given a platform to spew their bullshit no matter what. I rather enjoyed EN for a long time now (basically since it started). Granted, not all is perfect here but this guys ramblings are a shitstain on any eve related site. I´d rather read the propaganda bullshit at that other site instead of supporting EN any further, if it willingly promotes shit like this.

    February 26, 2013 at 12:27 am Reply
  10. Trufe

    You know it positively warms my heart to see people so ready to tell Goblin that ISK efficiency is a piss poor way of determining how good someone is at PVP. I love the consistency with which these same commenters crucify other ISK war proponents like -A- or oh wait….

    February 26, 2013 at 1:06 am Reply
  11. First failure: comparing hisec solo suicide ganking to lowsec or nullsec PvP.

    Second failure: comparing hisec solo suicide ganking of AFK mining barges to being in a battle involving thousands of players flying ships from rookie ships to titans.

    Third failure: asserting that all the money is in hisec because hisec is too good, thus hisec needs to be nerfed.

    “Without huge nerfs to highsec income to force at least the nullsec people to live in nullsec instead of farming in AFK Retrievers on the other screen, nullsec remains the wasteland it is today, lacking both decent income and targets to kill.”

    The truth is that if you remove the hisec income entirely, nullsec will still be a wasteland lacking decent income and targets to kill. Without an income, combat-seeking pilots will have nothing to fly. Without somewhere to build it, combat-seeking pilots will have nothing to fly. On top of that, the moment you start doing industry in nullsec you’ll have blues shooting you because that’s their attitude to “carebears” (because anyone who isn’t in a 300-strong combat fleet that docks up when reds are in local is a “carebear”), or just because they’re bored.

    What is needed is to alter the nature of industry such that it is pushed further and further into player control. Where are the manufacturing lines? Where the players put them. Where do you refine ore? Wherever you’ve set up the refinery. Where do you do invention? Wherever you’ve set up the infrastructure.

    February 26, 2013 at 1:08 am Reply
  12. nukemeheyeAFK

    i'm still loling at all these comments…awesomesauce! i will now be sure to ALWAYS read Goblin's post purely for the joy of the bashing that follows.

    February 26, 2013 at 1:20 am Reply
  13. iskbot#1337

    Enough is enough! Can we have mindcheap again instead of this fullretard dipshit.
    Even senseless talking tiny ugly titts are way better than this bullshit.

    February 26, 2013 at 1:36 am Reply
  14. INKling

    Er, correct me if I'm wrong but did any of these targets actually shoot back??

    February 26, 2013 at 1:42 am Reply
  15. iskbot#1337

    Enough is enough! Can we have mindcheap again instead of this fullretard dipshit.
    Even senseless talking tiny ugly titts are way better than this !!!

    February 26, 2013 at 1:55 am Reply
    1. SadButTrue

      The tits had a point though.

      February 26, 2013 at 1:52 pm Reply
  16. iskbot#1337

    Enough is enough! Can we have mindcheap again instead of this fullretard dipshit.

    February 26, 2013 at 1:57 am Reply
  17. fuftyd

    TLDR – Arrogant tosser needs a job and girlfriend.

    February 26, 2013 at 2:04 am Reply
  18. Gumpin

    Challenge for you Greedy.

    Get the same rates against people that fight back.

    We might give you some respect currency then.

    February 26, 2013 at 3:31 am Reply
    1. Aher

      Ganking ratting ships 5:1 counts as "against targets that fight back" ?

      March 1, 2013 at 8:25 am Reply
  19. Shattershark

    "This can be done profitably and can be upheld eternally, until CCP finally fixes the nullsec economy and makes it profitable to live there"

    Holy crap. This guy is clueless.
    Yeah, sentry carriers farming sanctums all day are not profitable enough, make it so that even passing gas in 0.0 would earn you isk.

    February 26, 2013 at 4:18 am Reply
  20. cBOLTSON

    Who are you and what the hell are you babbling on about? You ganked some miners? Were supposed to care? lol

    February 26, 2013 at 6:34 am Reply
  21. A Reader

    This Post is so bad, it made me install AdBlock.

    GJ Greedy.

    February 26, 2013 at 6:57 am Reply
  22. Sunbird

    I think guy was mostly sarcastic/ironic about himself and his achievements…IF people read, instead of just exploding over one quote taken out of context, then…well. I do understand he's too fricking self-promoting here, but some points he makes are good.

    First of all, his income is nothing. I don't bother too much, but I make about 0.5B isk up to 1-2B isk per day in NPC null sec region. I get 10-20 kills, sometimes less, sometimes lot more – depends on my activity. My corpies as well. Some even far better than me.

    But here's where Gob is correct: The 0.0 is mostly wasteland. Sometimes, you pass 10-15 or more jumps without a single player in those systems. Some systems you'll find full of people, fully upgraded, and safely bubbled with 50 bubbles anchored on each entry gate – they got the anoms, belts and deadspace plexes spawning. Or Pirate mission running systems. But those are not many.

    Pilot has to go number of jumps, to a specific area, if he's to provoke a fight. While income and opportunities in 0.0 are amazing, like I had the other day the chance to explain to a noobie from hisec – he got a jawdrop when I started explaining the 0.0 mechanics – podding, bubbles, wormhole ganks and such stuff…

    People from hisec don't choose the hisec coz of profitability, but due to the Risk vs. Return ratios. Lower risk in general prevails over good Return, as it is in EVE now.

    Think it's all he wanted to say.

    I did like the "neutral falcon" reference 😀

    February 26, 2013 at 7:10 am Reply
  23. Suck it

    What a tosser! Look at me i make isk! look at me i killed afk mining ships! look at me look at me. You sound like an attention starved spoiled brat.

    Your post is like a fat, wannabe, air soft "vet" bragging that he has 1000's of headshots on a non moving target and saying he is better than the Marine that has 4 confirmed kills. Grow up Goblin shit gets a lot more difficult when you have to worry about the target actually shooting back.

    February 26, 2013 at 9:21 am Reply
  24. HEavyb

    Ok, ill post this in capital letters so it is easyer to understand. it seems like alota pepole cant read.

    HE IS TALKING ABOUT A THEORY LAUNCHED EARLYER CALLED FARMS AND FIELDS! IT IS BASED AROUND THE FACT THAT THERE ARE FARMING FIELDS WHERE PLAYERS EARN MONEY BUT CAN ALSO BE VICTIM OF PVP! THE POINT HE IS TRYING TO MAKE IS THAT THERE ARE NO FARMS AND FIELDS IN 0.0. THE ONLY PLACE YOU CAN FIND THEM ARE IN HIGH SEC! WE SHOULRD WORK TO IMPROVE THAT, SO PEPOLE IN 0.0 CAN ACTUALY MAKE A LIVING THERE! AND VITALISE THIS PART OF EVE SO THAT IT IS SOMETHING FOR PVPERS OUT IN 0.0 AS WELL!!!!

    HE IS MAKING A POINT THAT MOST OF PVP IN 0.0 IS BIG BLOBS BECOUSE THERE ARE NO FARMS AND FIELDS WHERE SMALL PVPERS CAN HUNT FOR TARGETS!

    I LIVE IN 0.0 AND ID LIKE TO BE ONE OF THE FARMERS! I LIKE THE IDEA THAT I HAVE TO DEFEND MY HOME FROM BANDITS. ATM THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE CUSE ALL MY ALLIES ARE RUNNING AFK MINERS IN HIGH SEC!!!!!

    TRY TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE!!!!!!!!!!!

    February 26, 2013 at 10:09 am Reply
    1. lol

      if you don´t know how to roam or where to get targets in 0.0 i feel sorry for you. smallscale pvp is really not hard to get in 0.0. And pvp was never a thing to earn money. you are just as bad at this game as goblin is.

      February 26, 2013 at 10:20 am Reply
  25. Bloke

    another post that doesn`t make any sense. Where are you going with this ? What is the hidden point you are trying to make?. I`m sure you start off with the best of intentions Gevlin but you can never link the points together to make any fekkin literate sense. So you player verses player against botted or empty ships,, throw in some figures, say nullsec is broken but not why ? (i would guess because you have no idea why )
    Riv , I have been logging in to read Gevlins posts to giggle at the comments section.
    There comes a point where even that gets boring and people go to the "other site " to read something with content. Sort shit out

    February 26, 2013 at 11:47 am Reply
  26. dreamer.

    killing highsec miners is not PVP
    sure miners have to adapt and start to play safer with
    Procurer/Skiff andput a bloody tank on the hull. but this post makes no sense.
    sure you have destroyed someone else pixles and made them slow down. 20m isk for a hull+ fitting isnt very mutch

    and in some worst cases you actualy drover off some new player from the game. GJ sir your an A*hole

    You don't need to nerf highsec industry
    you should enhance lowsec / nullsec instead so you wan't to mine/build stuff there instead of in highsec.
    for example if you build 10x faster in lowsec and 20% faster in nullsec and there is special ore that 10/20% more dense in low/null then in highsec (same type)

    now you got a incentative to mine/build in nullsec

    and again i hate mining my self, i know ppl who like to torment them self doing that (sure i have done some binge mining my days but mining is a chore and alot more dull then shooting rats)

    Educate the miners tell them of the richness of ABC ore and what to expect for yield/h if they move to nullsec.

    anyway your blowing up miners that are fetching in the Trit / Pyr we need to build the ships / ammo you use in your hunt thus your your self part of the problem.

    February 26, 2013 at 11:48 am Reply
  27. Glevon Goblin has found the F1 key on the keyboard and is now able to kill afk miners! OMG OMG OMG

    0 fucks given

    February 26, 2013 at 1:11 pm Reply
  28. qwer

    Thanks for finally calling it solo ganking, not solo pvp!

    February 26, 2013 at 2:02 pm Reply
  29. fuckthisshit

    so many people missing the point … I refuse to believe so many people are this retarded, but assume this is just one giant troll so people like me will make a post about retards so they can laugh at me for not getting the ironic shitposting

    February 26, 2013 at 2:12 pm Reply
    1. niggggg

      actually all this people are aware that his main intention is not to brag about his sologanking or wallet. however as always he draws wrong conclusions, mainly because he does not know what the fuck he is talking about.

      nullsec does need work but not for the reason this ass burger states in his article. also his numbers are not fitting to explain what he wants to communicate.

      February 26, 2013 at 2:58 pm Reply
  30. druid_cilnok

    I disagree with your need to push everyone back in to 0.0 for a number of reasons. With HS being good for carebears, it attracts people to the game, I dont remember seeing the numbers as high as they are at the moment for the 2 years that I have played the game. It stands to reason that some of the newer players will want to move to a 0.0 alliance for PVP or whatever creating more targets and more content for those of us in 0.0

    There are people ratting in lots of places in 0.0, just nowhere near deployment locations, cos that would be dumb as fuck, and either way its not that much fun to kill carebears anyway, cos of the lack of fight. Unless of course its a ratting Nyx, then there is a pleasure in killing them.

    Keep High Sec as it is. Improve Sov warfare. Attract new players from HS into 0.0.

    February 26, 2013 at 2:18 pm Reply
    1. retardedmonkeyfuck

      I agree with this comment completely.

      February 26, 2013 at 11:46 pm Reply
  31. rasz

    50B/month
    40Mil average retriever kill
    5 mil “profit” per one

    about 6B profit
    for running 20 alts , eating cheatos and being a virgin

    That is a high price for 6Bil

    February 26, 2013 at 4:32 pm Reply
  32. Jimmy

    After months and months of stumbling upon this guys articles, transitioning from utter disbelief to mild annoyance to finally being strangely drawn to them, and as I continue to read the utter bullwank he takes immense time to construct I can see only one obvious conclusion.

    He must be a pro troll.

    February 26, 2013 at 4:39 pm Reply
    1. retardedmonkeyfuck

      Bullwank! That is a great description i will borrow in future! I share your general view, well put sir.

      February 26, 2013 at 11:35 pm Reply
    2. CareBearStares
      February 28, 2013 at 4:34 pm Reply
  33. noahbody

    This douche is proud of saying he beat WoW. Well thats the kind of player he is. Podantic and child like with a sense for min maxing and theory crafting numbers. Thats it…hes every other WoW kid bringing that mentality to the sandbox.

    February 26, 2013 at 7:55 pm Reply
  34. BPr

    Jesus!

    February 27, 2013 at 12:21 am Reply
    1. Jesus

      Yes?

      February 27, 2013 at 11:41 am Reply
  35. doh

    Another excellent example, why nobody wants WoW-Kiddies outside of WoW… *headdesk*

    February 27, 2013 at 3:52 pm Reply
  36. Anon

    I think someone needs to explain that eve is all about being in an alliance and helping your alliance to be great. If you are doing anything other then that in eve you are no body and no amount of statistics is going to change that.

    February 27, 2013 at 4:32 pm Reply
  37. Avic

    Funny how so many of you denigrating him are too stupid to understand the point behind the post. So his satire about his kills didn't really get through to you. Whatever – the point about highsec vs nullsec really isn't that hard to figure out.

    February 28, 2013 at 6:40 am Reply
  38. Toodles

    I think most people here understand the point he is *trying* to make. But he's used 100% fallacious logic and comparisons, which by definition means he has not proven his point.

    If I said "Look guys, the price of sun dried tomatoes is going to quadruple tomorrow because I just unplugged my headphones", I'd expect to be denigrated for it because it is a ridiculous comparison to make with 100% flawed logic. It is, utter nonsense. And that is what glevon goblin does in almost all of his posts. To put it into your language:

    "Funny how the few who support him are too stupid to understand he used completely erroneous and illogical comparisons to try to make a point."

    Pretending it was satire doesn't make anything in his post more accurate.

    February 28, 2013 at 7:33 am Reply
    1. Nurbles

      How is it inaccurate?

      March 4, 2013 at 4:25 pm Reply
  39. Fire this scrub

    "No, it’s not another business report, my income is 1.2B/day (8B/week) and no one cares about that. " <- Why don't you write about that then? How much have you made? You've played for a year now right? So you should have 300ish Billion? Make a video, showing what you trade and your market logs. That would be worth reading and watching.
    Prove it.

    Very few people in this world care about a scrub killing more scrubs. "OMG I'm over 9000 times better then test!"
    No, you're not, because if you were, you'd be in PL.
    Here is a good PvPer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5cCALuzmzc
    If you're as "pro" as you say you are, watch that, learn it, and go do it.
    Otherwise, go pop your collar elsewhere.

    Once again, River, get better staff, this kind of garbage makes you look bad.

    February 28, 2013 at 6:14 pm Reply
    1. Loki

      You are fucking retarded and didnt get the point at all. Get out!

      March 3, 2013 at 2:25 pm Reply
      1. Gob, is that you?

        Alt much?
        We didn't get your point, because your a horrible computer user that doesn't know an electron from an Popsicle .

        Go back to playing WoW like the little bitch you are 😉

        March 4, 2013 at 7:21 pm Reply
  40. Moe

    This isn't PvP, this is PvMiner

    February 28, 2013 at 10:45 pm Reply
  41. Polish Lumber

    Good job! I'm fitting a catalyst up for a similiar month.

    March 5, 2013 at 9:21 pm Reply
  42. Bob

    So now the goblin has made his money, he wants to nerf the place so everyone is screwed……

    March 7, 2013 at 7:49 pm Reply
  43. Chris

    I've never seen a post with a higher percentage of people who didn't get the main point.

    March 16, 2013 at 5:45 am Reply

Leave a Reply